Proteins in assemblages formed by phase separation possess properties that promote their transformation to autoantigens: Implications for autoimmunity.

Autoantibodies in systemic autoimmunity are directed against only ~5% of the proteome. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the properties of assemblages (also known as Membraneless Organelles and Biological Condensates) and their protein constituents partly explain the immunological selectivity of autoimmunity. Assemblages arise from phase separation of their protein components, akin to partitioning of oil droplets in water. We obtained from a prediction algorithm (Vernon et al., elife7, 2018) the propensity scores (PScores), i.e., likelihood, for phase separation of autoantigens and non-autoantigens. We then compared autoantigens with the highest PScores to identify shared structural properties. The mean PScores for autoantigens (n = 1050) and the entire human proteome of non-autoantigens (n = 17,532) were 1.46 and 1.09 (p = 1.2E-08). To varying extents, the 25 autoantigens with the highest phase separation propensities shared additional features such as compositional bias, repeated domains, coiled coil regions, nucleic acid binding, and disorder. Most of these properties were present with greater frequencies than their frequencies in the non-autoantigens. We conclude that, on average, autoantigens have a higher predisposition to undergo phase separation, thus, they are more likely to exist in assemblages compared with the average non-autoantigen. We suggest that assemblage formation and the greater than average presence of certain structural features are key factors in selection of a portion of the autoimmune repertoire. Other properties of assemblage proteins, such as high concentration and tendency to form novel complexes with other proteins, may partially explain why assemblages are potent sources of autoantigens.

Nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of neural stem cell microRNAs.

Although generally regarded as functional in the cytoplasm, a number of microRNAs (miRNAs) have been found in the nucleus, possibly with a role in gene regulation. Here we report that, in fact, a substantial fraction of all human miRNAs are present in the nucleus of neural stem cells. Further, subsets of these miRNAs display consistently higher standardized rank in the nucleus than in the cytoplasm of these cells, as identified with an RT-qPCR technology and confirmed by microarray analysis. Likewise, other miRNAs display higher cytoplasmic standardized ranks. Three samples were partitioned into nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions in six assays for 373 miRNAs. From the 100 most highly expressed miRNAs, standard scores of nuclear and cytoplasmic concentrations were determined. Among those, 21 miRNAs had all three nuclear standard scores higher than all three cytoplasmic scores; likewise, 31 miRNAs had consistently higher cytoplasmic scores. Random concentrations would result in only five in each set. Remarkably, if one miRNA has a high standard score in a compartment, then other miRNAs having the same 5' seeds and certain similar 3' end patterns are also highly scored in the same way. That is, in addition to the seed sequence, 3' sequence similarity criteria identify families of mature miRNAs with consistently high nuclear or cytoplasmic expression.

Additional layers of gene regulatory complexity from recently discovered microRNA mechanisms.

In recent years microRNAs have become recognized as pervasive, versatile agents of gene regulation. Some widely embraced rules involving Watson-Crick hybridization of microRNAs with mRNAs have generated great interest as scientists envision potential RNA cargoes for gene therapy and other experimental systems. However, while researchers ardently seek simplifying principles, nature seems very uncooperative. This article reviews some small RNA mechanisms that potentially regulate genes and which are not covered by previous microRNAs characterizations. In addition, we report here results of fluorescence microscopy experiments to directly demonstrate nuclear import of small RNAs equal in length to typical mature microRNAs, implying that gene regulation at the locus of transcription might be possible.

Anti-cooperative assembly of the SRP19 and SRP68/72 components of the signal recognition particle.

The mammalian SRP (signal recognition particle) represents an important model for the assembly and role of inter-domain interactions in complex RNPs (ribonucleoproteins). In the present study we analysed the interdependent interactions between the SRP19, SRP68 and SRP72 proteins and the SRP RNA. SRP72 binds the SRP RNA largely via non-specific electrostatic interactions and enhances the affinity of SRP68 for the RNA. SRP19 and SRP68 both bind directly and specifically to the same two RNA helices, but on opposite faces and at opposite ends. SRP19 binds at the apices of helices 6 and 8, whereas the SRP68/72 heterodimer binds at the three-way junction involving RNA helices 5, 6 and 8. Even though both SRP19 and SRP68/72 stabilize a similar parallel orientation for RNA helices 6 and 8, these two proteins bind to the RNA with moderate anti-cooperativity. Long-range anti-cooperative binding by SRP19 and SRP68/72 appears to arise from stabilization of distinct conformations in the stiff intervening RNA scaffold. Assembly of large RNPs is generally thought to involve either co-operative or energetically neutral interactions among components. By contrast, our findings emphasize that antagonistic interactions can play significant roles in assembly of multi-subunit RNPs.

Compartmentalization directs assembly of the signal recognition particle.

Many ribonucleoprotein complexes assemble stepwise in distinct cellular compartments, a process that usually involves bidirectional transport of both RNA and proteins between the nucleus and cytoplasm. The biological rationale for such complex transport steps in RNP assembly is obscure. One important example is the eukaryotic signal recognition particle (SRP), a cytoplasmic RNP consisting of one RNA and six proteins. Prior in vivo studies support an "SRP54-late" assembly model in which all SRP proteins, except SRP54, are imported from the cytoplasm to the nucleus to bind SRP RNA. This partially assembled complex is then exported to the cytoplasm where SRP54 binds and forms the SRP holocomplex. Here we show that native SRP assembly requires segregated and ordered binding by its protein components. A native ternary complex forms in vitro when SRP19 binds the SRP RNA prior to binding by SRP54, which approximates the eukaryotic cellular pathway. In contrast, the presence of SRP54 disrupts native assembly of SRP19, such that two RNA-binding loops in SRP19 misfold. These results imply that SRP54 must be sequestered during early SRP assembly steps, as apparently occurs in vivo, for proper assembly of the SRP to occur. Our findings emphasize that spatial compartmentalization provides an additional level of regulation that prevents competition among components and can function to promote native assembly of the eukaryotic SRP.